Skip to main content

An In-depth Analysis: Guess Who

As promised on Twitter (follow me, on second thought... don't, I'm boring) I will go way too in depth on the family room classic, Guess Who. Here we go.

I should probably get the board out for reference..

So for you monkeys who have not played this wondrous game, I shall explain the premise.

You start by each selecting a card with a character's face on it. That face is somewhere on a flipy-board thing each player has, which consists of 23 other faces. The object of the game is to guess your opponent's mystery person by asking yes-or-no elimination questions. Based on the answer you get, you knock down the characters that don't fit the description.

So you could ask random questions, but there definitely is a strategy to ask particular questions to eliminate the most people. Some may call this cheating.. it's not. I checked.

Normal questions would include something like, "Is your person's hair white?" or "Is your person female?". Now by design, each major physical trait such as hair colour, glasses, eye colour, facial hair, etc. all will have 5 people fall under that trait. This limits your ability to knock down too many people at once. However, you could also ask questions that apply to a wider range or narrower range of people on the board. For example, if you ask "is your person male?", and it is, you only get to knock down the females. This is a disadvantage since males outnumber females 3:1. If the character is a female though, you knock down the majority of the field and therefore have a huge advantage off the bat. Or, by asking if the person has a feather on their hat, which applies to only one person, you risk a lot, since the probability of your opponent having George is pretty low (1/24). If your opponent does have George, you're a lucky bastard.

To ask better questions, you should ask multi-questions to which the answer is still only yes or no. For example, "Does your person have a hat or facial hair", therefore eliminating 2 physical traits instead of only hats or facial hair and getting down to their character before they get down to yours.

You should aim to pick questions that apply to half the remaining people on the board. Your question loses the optimal knock-down number if it applies to greater than or less than half. So try it out next time! It'll work great until your opponent catches on and starts copying your strategy, then maybe it's time to switch games.

Happy Guess-Who-ing!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Euroblog Part 7

This series ended up being far longer than I anticipated. I could make an ebook about my travels! Who am I kidding, no one would want to read that... let alone buy it. Also, side note: Polarsteps was so great up until a couple days ago when it went haywire and threw a bunch of phantom travel paths on my map. Support said it has been fixed however, there was no way to remove the phantom lines. This all makes for a ton of work for me to redo all of the travel steps. It's unfortunate but I understand these things happen. Anyway, it's all updated now and working as it should, sorry to my 7000  7 followers for any inconvenience. Now that it's all back to normal, here is the link if you'd like to check out my trip! If you missed any of the series, check it out on my social media feeds or on my blog homepage. The last post is right here! July 22 2017 Wow, am I ever behind on this. [Left off in Florence] So I went up the massive dome of the Florence Cathedral...

Let's Talk About Timelines

This was originally going to be solely a discussion on time travel. However, discussing the timeline is a rather good starting point before or while discussing time travel. I've always wanted to write about my thoughts on time and time travel. It is one of those obscure enough topics where anyone can theorize about the generalities of it. But are those theories based in any realm of realism? There are well-respected theorists like Stephen Hawking who have gone into great detail regarding time travel. There are a ton of TV shows and movies which go to great lengths to be as accurate as possible. In our current understanding of physics, time travel is mathematically allowed. But the reality is that we just don't know, yet. Perhaps there is another law of physics we have yet to discover which proves time travel is fundamentally not possible. But it's fun to think about regardless. Let's start simple. If I were to build a time machine right now, would I be able to use i...

My Covid-19 Analysis

Hi Everyone. Been a while... We live in interesting times right now. There is a global behavioural shift happening all because of this nanoscale warrior that barley classifies as a living thing. Covid-19 has disrupted the world faster and more efficiently than almost any other thing in the last few decades. All of the news and social media out there about the virus is scary, and rightfully so. But it's important to stay informed about the facts, and I'm here to help arm you with them through this pandemic. Below is a report that highlights Covid-19's Global, Canadian and Ontarian reach. There are plenty of visuals out there tasked with doing the same, but this is mine. It's a static report because I'm not rich enough to afford a license for the software I use (thanks work!). Data is accumulated daily from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the Canadian government's outbreak update site and Ontario's Data Catalog. Take a look an...